For a revolution to spread you need a class of under utilized and under valued or unemployed lower middle classes.
Pol Pot knew this and killed anyone with glasses but i bet his comrades came from that very class.Hitler came from the Lower Middle classes and so did the commnunists in Russia.I can’t narrow down Pol Pot but he was certainly Middle class and unsucessful.The working classes grievances do not travel or transmute into any radical ideas …but the LMC ( lower middle classes) can and do have the numbers / education /organisation / leadership potential / discontent to create ideas with contagion .
Upper middle and middle have too much prestige and assets to consider the turmoil of ‘change’ but their children will dabble with revolution as a substitute to fighting the overbearing authority of their parents.Once in the slipstream of adult middle classdom they opt out of this foolishness and behave just like their parents.
An industrialized or powerful bureaucratic state will have a large lower middle class that in corrupt/ failing socieites will never get a chance to overcome the hurdles of the times….they become the seed bed of revolution.Look at the solid support for religious anti western anger amongst the Lower middle classes inPakistan that is the bedrock of the ambivalence towards the terrorism.They see corruption and collusion of the elites with the West …and no chance for a fair and decent exsistence for themselves….hence the support for any revolutionary ideology such as political Islamism.
Pakistan is not a ferevently religious country…its more ethnically/caste divided.Failure of the State and a large lower middle class that sees no future for itself ( accurately ) are the components of the seemingly crazed tendencies of the people.
And that applies through history as well.India was run by a large army of lower middle class Indians for whom a glass ceiling was imposed by the Brits.Their education lent them organisation…their discontent was the vehicle for change.Upper and Elites never want change ….in bad times , the Peasants die …the LMC don’t ….they revolt.
Origins of LMC….?
Army mid ranks ..officer ranks platoon commnaders?
Large states that require more than just elitist Middle classes …tax collecters?( the foot soldiers ..not the regional recipients)..
So obvious point….Revolution requires a State.Is it an intrinsic property that States go through?
I think so.
Is it more pointedly…just the convulsions of an ever increasing productivity cycle.( that itself leads to a State) that causes a LMC to be sustained and created …which itself then lends itself to convulsions when under producing.