http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1906642,00.html
It seems strange..but its obvious..why did’nt we mate and evolve to a ‘beauty’ standard.
This article seems to prove the obvious…but it is quite sinister really.Ugly babies would probably be less well likely to survive and hence the surviving population should get prettier and prettier ( according to this article) .Whether its some subliminal inner mammalian desire for stronger offspring, who knows.But why hav’nt we homogenised our face/beauty by breeding into it our preferred characteristics ?
I think people who perceive themselves as short or ugly and short , are some the most motivated and entrepreneurial sections of society as they try to make up for their own perceived deficiencies ( thats on an individual level).But sucessful people mate more than others and hence they spread their genes in disproportionate numbers..
The bottom line is that when it comes to raw breeding success…being ugly or short must have its advantages..because otherwise there would have been an inexorable rise of the ‘beautiful’ face and that has’nt happened in any population in the world.
